|
Post by starry on Feb 3, 2014 8:40:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on Feb 3, 2014 15:02:46 GMT -5
I'm not sure to understand but it seems a dead end cause a cross H. tuberosus x H. annuus is weakly fertile and the F2 is infertile ? (see above)
|
|
|
Post by starry on Feb 3, 2014 15:30:31 GMT -5
I guess I let my enthusiasm get ahead of my reading Interesting info anyhow.
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on Feb 4, 2014 3:55:45 GMT -5
Hey me too, i was quoting in ecstasy until the lasts sentences. It is maybe not a dead end, but a one-shot breeding. One can still propagate the hybrid vegetatively, and maybe the F1 can produce offspring if self-pollinate ? So it is worth the try i think. One has to get a fertile sunchoke and a very big seeded sunflower and try crosses until the seeds of the hybrids are big. A medium sized seeded hybrid is still great for poultry i think, and the hybrid is interesting for fodder as noted in the article.
|
|
|
Post by agrorev on Feb 5, 2014 10:16:31 GMT -5
Maybe creating an amphidiploid will restore fertility like the the Cucurbita and Phaseolus interspecific crosses?
|
|
|
Post by starry on Feb 5, 2014 11:04:01 GMT -5
Maybe creating an amphidiploid will restore fertility like the the Cucurbita and Phaseolus interspecific crosses? Do you know how that is done?
|
|
|
Post by oxbowfarm on Feb 5, 2014 11:29:03 GMT -5
Colchicine?
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Feb 5, 2014 12:43:14 GMT -5
You could also try to use a bridging species.
It would take some research to identify a suitable candidate, but it's always worth considering as a means to overcome incompatibility issues in wide crosses.
|
|
|
Post by starry on Feb 5, 2014 12:52:10 GMT -5
A bridge species like another species of Helianthus?
|
|
|
Post by starry on Feb 5, 2014 13:20:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Graham on Feb 5, 2014 13:24:54 GMT -5
Yup.
One that's more compatible with your two target species than they are with each other. You would move the larger seed head from H. annuus into the bridging species then use your new hybrid to introduce the trait into H. tuberosus.
That's assuming a suitable species exists.
|
|
|
Post by starry on Feb 5, 2014 13:55:58 GMT -5
After staring at it for a bit I am assuming it is just showing that if you breed the various species together in the combinations shown you can get a population of hybrids that all have the same number of chromosomes?
|
|
|
Post by starry on Feb 5, 2014 14:18:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by agrorev on Feb 6, 2014 17:50:50 GMT -5
The backcross of the F1s to the tuberosus may be completely sterile, but the F1s are very diverse and can be crossed amongst themselves for multiple generations. Doesn't seem like a dead end. Is there an advantage to be able to back cross to the parent as opposed to crossing just among the F1s and their progeny? I guess you might more easily influence certain characteristics. The sterile tuberosus x (tuberosus x annuus) could be potentially useful as a clonally propagated crop as Graham says. The article also mentions there was one individual of such a backcross that was highly fertile. Another example that even in crosses that don't normally work well, there is the occasional combination that pairs well for whatever reason.
It seems the image confirms what the article says: you can create a diverse breeding group of tetraploid Helianthus hybrids when using tuberosus as the seed parent.
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on Feb 7, 2014 2:56:07 GMT -5
Great news !
|
|